Template talk:MajorGods - Revision history

Xenophile at 16:41, 26 February 2007

2007-02-26T16:41:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:41, 26 February 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Very nice! Much appreciated. I was a bit hesitant to actually do much on this front, as I wasn't sure why it was the way it was and so (it looked like it was more split up and then consolidated)... Regardless, your template does the trick, thanks! [[User:Landrin Mard\|macma]] 13:32, 22 February 2007 (PST)		Very nice! Much appreciated. I was a bit hesitant to actually do much on this front, as I wasn't sure why it was the way it was and so (it looked like it was more split up and then consolidated)... Regardless, your template does the trick, thanks! [[User:Landrin Mard\|macma]] 13:32, 22 February 2007 (PST)

			:Thanks for the thumbs-up, got me to do the whole crew. Evolution of the wiki, good stuff. --[[User:Xenophile\|Xenophile]] 08:41, 26 February 2007 (PST)

Landrin Mard at 21:32, 22 February 2007

2007-02-22T21:32:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:32, 22 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is there a reason for grouping all non-major gods in all of "Intermediate Gods", "Lesser Gods" and "Demi Gods". I would prefer to split these up to just include the gods of the corresponding category (like "Major Gods" is now). Then either include just the other deities of the same "level" and a link to a page with all deities; or include links to all gods (major and not) at the top of each god's page. In general I think the nagivation of deities is difficult or not as easy as it could be. --[[User:Landrin Mard\|~~Mac~~]] 19:00, 3 Apr 2006 (GMT)		Is there a reason for grouping all non-major gods in all of "Intermediate Gods", "Lesser Gods" and "Demi Gods". I would prefer to split these up to just include the gods of the corresponding category (like "Major Gods" is now). Then either include just the other deities of the same "level" and a link to a page with all deities; or include links to all gods (major and not) at the top of each god's page. In general I think the nagivation of deities is difficult or not as easy as it could be. --[[User:Landrin Mard\|macma]] 19:00, 3 Apr 2006 (GMT)

	:I agree. I prefer having the full catalog at the top, makes navigation a snap. I'm trying a new template. --[[User:Xenophile\|Xenophile]] 10:57, 21 February 2007 (PST)		:I agree. I prefer having the full catalog at the top, makes navigation a snap. I'm trying a new template. --[[User:Xenophile\|Xenophile]] 10:57, 21 February 2007 (PST)

			Very nice! Much appreciated. I was a bit hesitant to actually do much on this front, as I wasn't sure why it was the way it was and so (it looked like it was more split up and then consolidated)... Regardless, your template does the trick, thanks! [[User:Landrin Mard\|macma]] 13:32, 22 February 2007 (PST)

Xenophile at 18:57, 21 February 2007

2007-02-21T18:57:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:57, 21 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is there a reason for grouping all non-major gods in all of "Intermediate Gods", "Lesser Gods" and "Demi Gods". I would prefer to split these up to just include the gods of the corresponding category (like "Major Gods" is now). Then either include just the other deities of the same "level" and a link to a page with all deities; or include links to all gods (major and not) at the top of each god's page. In general I think the nagivation of deities is difficult or not as easy as it could be. --[[User:Landrin Mard\|Mac]] 19:00, 3 Apr 2006 (GMT)		Is there a reason for grouping all non-major gods in all of "Intermediate Gods", "Lesser Gods" and "Demi Gods". I would prefer to split these up to just include the gods of the corresponding category (like "Major Gods" is now). Then either include just the other deities of the same "level" and a link to a page with all deities; or include links to all gods (major and not) at the top of each god's page. In general I think the nagivation of deities is difficult or not as easy as it could be. --[[User:Landrin Mard\|Mac]] 19:00, 3 Apr 2006 (GMT)

			:I agree. I prefer having the full catalog at the top, makes navigation a snap. I'm trying a new template. --[[User:Xenophile\|Xenophile]] 10:57, 21 February 2007 (PST)

Landrin Mard at 19:00, 3 April 2006

2006-04-03T19:00:08Z

New page

Is there a reason for grouping all non-major gods in all of "Intermediate Gods", "Lesser Gods" and "Demi Gods". I would prefer to split these up to just include the gods of the corresponding category (like "Major Gods" is now). Then either include just the other deities of the same "level" and a link to a page with all deities; or include links to all gods (major and not) at the top of each god's page. In general I think the nagivation of deities is difficult or not as easy as it could be. --[[User:Landrin Mard|Mac]] 19:00, 3 Apr 2006 (GMT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:32, 22 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is there a reason for grouping all non-major gods in all of "Intermediate Gods", "Lesser Gods" and "Demi Gods". I would prefer to split these up to just include the gods of the corresponding category (like "Major Gods" is now). Then either include just the other deities of the same "level" and a link to a page with all deities; or include links to all gods (major and not) at the top of each god's page. In general I think the nagivation of deities is difficult or not as easy as it could be. --[[User:Landrin Mard\|~~Mac~~]] 19:00, 3 Apr 2006 (GMT)		Is there a reason for grouping all non-major gods in all of "Intermediate Gods", "Lesser Gods" and "Demi Gods". I would prefer to split these up to just include the gods of the corresponding category (like "Major Gods" is now). Then either include just the other deities of the same "level" and a link to a page with all deities; or include links to all gods (major and not) at the top of each god's page. In general I think the nagivation of deities is difficult or not as easy as it could be. --[[User:Landrin Mard\|macma]] 19:00, 3 Apr 2006 (GMT)

	:I agree. I prefer having the full catalog at the top, makes navigation a snap. I'm trying a new template. --[[User:Xenophile\|Xenophile]] 10:57, 21 February 2007 (PST)		:I agree. I prefer having the full catalog at the top, makes navigation a snap. I'm trying a new template. --[[User:Xenophile\|Xenophile]] 10:57, 21 February 2007 (PST)

			Very nice! Much appreciated. I was a bit hesitant to actually do much on this front, as I wasn't sure why it was the way it was and so (it looked like it was more split up and then consolidated)... Regardless, your template does the trick, thanks! [[User:Landrin Mard\|macma]] 13:32, 22 February 2007 (PST)