Talk:PCs: Difference between revisions
Spokeydonkey (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Spokeydonkey (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Doesn't matter to me. Aesthetically, line breaks and bullets look about the same. The big project I want to do is subcategories of PCs by server(s) they're most active on. Also a section for NPCs. But those are a helluva lot of work.--[[User:Spokeydonkey|Pokey]] | Doesn't matter to me. Aesthetically, line breaks and bullets look about the same. The big project I want to do is subcategories of PCs by server(s) they're most active on. Also a section for NPCs. But those are a helluva lot of work.--[[User:Spokeydonkey|Pokey]] | ||
Mikona is already working one if you check. Personally, I don't see a great need to link two codingwise, just have two different links that link to the same article.--[[User:Zonr 0|Zonr_0]] 23:22, 26 Jan 2006 (GMT) | |||
Adding the text <nowiki>[[Category:BLAHBLAHBLAH]]</nowiki> to an article automatically generates a page with that category name listing all articles in there. It doesn't require more work than that. That's what I meant by categorizing. Also, people seem to not be using categories at all, which isn't that big a deal, but something to put in during your spare time.--[[User:Spokeydonkey|Pokey]] | |||
Latest revision as of 16:38, 31 January 2006
Which seems better for the format? 'listing' the PCs with the asterik or individually starting new lines using the br? I would go ahead and do the former for the entire page if people don't mind. (I have some time to slack off kill right now)--Zonr_0 19:17, 26 Jan 2006 (GMT)
Doesn't matter to me. Aesthetically, line breaks and bullets look about the same. The big project I want to do is subcategories of PCs by server(s) they're most active on. Also a section for NPCs. But those are a helluva lot of work.--Pokey
Mikona is already working one if you check. Personally, I don't see a great need to link two codingwise, just have two different links that link to the same article.--Zonr_0 23:22, 26 Jan 2006 (GMT)
Adding the text [[Category:BLAHBLAHBLAH]] to an article automatically generates a page with that category name listing all articles in there. It doesn't require more work than that. That's what I meant by categorizing. Also, people seem to not be using categories at all, which isn't that big a deal, but something to put in during your spare time.--Pokey