Template talk:MajorGods: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Landrin Mard (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is there a reason for grouping all non-major gods in all of "Intermediate Gods", "Lesser Gods" and "Demi Gods". I would prefer to split these up to just include the gods of the corresponding category (like "Major Gods" is now). Then either include just the other deities of the same "level" and a link to a page with all deities; or include links to all gods (major and not) at the top of each god's page. In general I think the nagivation of deities is difficult or not as easy as it could be. --[[User:Landrin Mard| | Is there a reason for grouping all non-major gods in all of "Intermediate Gods", "Lesser Gods" and "Demi Gods". I would prefer to split these up to just include the gods of the corresponding category (like "Major Gods" is now). Then either include just the other deities of the same "level" and a link to a page with all deities; or include links to all gods (major and not) at the top of each god's page. In general I think the nagivation of deities is difficult or not as easy as it could be. --[[User:Landrin Mard|macma]] 19:00, 3 Apr 2006 (GMT) | ||
:I agree. I prefer having the full catalog at the top, makes navigation a snap. I'm trying a new template. --[[User:Xenophile|Xenophile]] 10:57, 21 February 2007 (PST) | :I agree. I prefer having the full catalog at the top, makes navigation a snap. I'm trying a new template. --[[User:Xenophile|Xenophile]] 10:57, 21 February 2007 (PST) | ||
Very nice! Much appreciated. I was a bit hesitant to actually do much on this front, as I wasn't sure why it was the way it was and so (it looked like it was more split up and then consolidated)... Regardless, your template does the trick, thanks! [[User:Landrin Mard|macma]] 13:32, 22 February 2007 (PST) | |||
Revision as of 21:32, 22 February 2007
Is there a reason for grouping all non-major gods in all of "Intermediate Gods", "Lesser Gods" and "Demi Gods". I would prefer to split these up to just include the gods of the corresponding category (like "Major Gods" is now). Then either include just the other deities of the same "level" and a link to a page with all deities; or include links to all gods (major and not) at the top of each god's page. In general I think the nagivation of deities is difficult or not as easy as it could be. --macma 19:00, 3 Apr 2006 (GMT)
- I agree. I prefer having the full catalog at the top, makes navigation a snap. I'm trying a new template. --Xenophile 10:57, 21 February 2007 (PST)
Very nice! Much appreciated. I was a bit hesitant to actually do much on this front, as I wasn't sure why it was the way it was and so (it looked like it was more split up and then consolidated)... Regardless, your template does the trick, thanks! macma 13:32, 22 February 2007 (PST)