Talk:Telepathy: Difference between revisions

From Avlis Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
:Well, the term 'surface thoughts' may imply enough of an understanding to not necessarily gain information the mind would not consciously reveal, right? Which implies the skill bonii of the power, but not that it breaks RP. [[User:Gurky Bogglewig|Gurky Bogglewig]] 12:42, 14 September 2010 (CDT)
:Well, the term 'surface thoughts' may imply enough of an understanding to not necessarily gain information the mind would not consciously reveal, right? Which implies the skill bonii of the power, but not that it breaks RP. [[User:Gurky Bogglewig|Gurky Bogglewig]] 12:42, 14 September 2010 (CDT)
::Umh.. The telepathy guide states nothing at all can be read. -- [[User:Kthxbye|Kthxbye]] 12:52, 14 September 2010 (CDT)
::Umh.. The telepathy guide states nothing at all can be read. -- [[User:Kthxbye|Kthxbye]] 12:52, 14 September 2010 (CDT)
:::Perhaps we should reword it then. I mean, it's clearly suggested that ESP gives you an advantage in terms of persuade, bluff, and intimidate, but not because one is aware of surface thoughts... why don't we change that to 'surface emotions'? This doesn't imply reading actual thoughts. [[User:Gurky Bogglewig|Gurky Bogglewig]] 13:06, 14 September 2010 (CDT)

Revision as of 18:06, 14 September 2010

According to the telepathy guide, ESP can't work the way it is described now. Kthxbye 12:35, 14 September 2010 (CDT)

Well, the term 'surface thoughts' may imply enough of an understanding to not necessarily gain information the mind would not consciously reveal, right? Which implies the skill bonii of the power, but not that it breaks RP. Gurky Bogglewig 12:42, 14 September 2010 (CDT)
Umh.. The telepathy guide states nothing at all can be read. -- Kthxbye 12:52, 14 September 2010 (CDT)
Perhaps we should reword it then. I mean, it's clearly suggested that ESP gives you an advantage in terms of persuade, bluff, and intimidate, but not because one is aware of surface thoughts... why don't we change that to 'surface emotions'? This doesn't imply reading actual thoughts. Gurky Bogglewig 13:06, 14 September 2010 (CDT)